Category Archives: social commentary

Project 365 3-21-2010 Surprise Brunch and Congress

Today was a pretty uneventful day.  The biggest news of the day, the news heard around the world, is that the United States Congress passed the Heath Care Reform bill.  It took over my Twitter page and filled up the Facebook news feed.  I don’t even know where I fall on the debate.  I know I agree with the idea of heath care reform, but I have not been able to keep up with the changes to the bill nor have I been able to cut through the bullshit both sides have been shooting at us for the last six months.

Political rant: I do not care for either party, Republicans or Democrats.  As far as I’m concerned they are all doing the exact same thing, spending my money on their pet projects, but they choose to spend it on different stuff.  I do not support or endorse anyone who is a career politician nor do I want to hear from someone who has ever listened to a lobbyist.  I just don’t like it. 

All that being said, if HCR means that Rene is no longer punished for being a woman when it comes to getting insurance then I’m for that.  If I can get decent insurance that costs less than a quarter of my annual income then I’m for that too.  I look forward to hearing about what was actually passed today.  I have a feeling neither side really knows what that is yet.

Speaking of sides, have the lines been drawn on Facebook!  The arguments are getting fierce and this is just the first day.  Hard core Republicans are calling this the downfall of the country while hard core Democrats are calling it the salvation!  If we’re lucky it might fall somewhere in the middle and might just be the first step toward a real solution.

OK, no more political talk!  Today’s picture is of this:

We went to brunch at the last minute after thinking we weren’t going to brunch.  It ended up being really fast, but really nice.  We’re going to miss Spadra when it’s gone, but we’re enjoying the experience while we can.  Today I got the breakfast quesadilla.  It was delightful.

Ugh, after reading this I’m dreading the possible comments that I might get, but I’m never one to back away from a good debate.  What are your thoughts on HCR?  Help convince me one way or the other.

See you tomorrow!

2 Comments

Filed under politics, project 365 2010, social commentary

Project 365 3-10-2010

So I woke up today to hear that Corey Haim died.  I was surprised, a little.  Last I heard he was cleaning up his act so that he could work again, but that isn’t what happened.  I would have moved on without talking about it except that through the rest of the morning Facebook started to blow up with commentary on his death.  Some reflective, most that he was a ‘major crush,’ but there were people that just seemed to forget that he was a person.  It’s easy to judge people on their life choices (lord knows I have), but I know enough people who have/are suffering from addiction and, even though it’s a really bad choice that leads you there, that doesn’t make them bad people. I just think it’s important to remember that.

But enough of that.

Today continued what has been an excessively busy week.  Agent talks, contract talks, etc… Oh and teaching.  It’s been crazy great and SO close to all paying off.  Can’t wait for that.

Today’s picture is of a laughing Buddha in one of the offices I was at:

See you tomorrow!

2 Comments

Filed under business, making movies, project 365 2010, social commentary

Project 365 2-15-2010 Saw “Up In the Air” & “Avatar” – I Totally get it!

Today was a an awful day to do business.  By noon it was clear that just about nothing would get done, and seeing as I’m run down from going nonstop the last few weeks, I decided to go with it and catch up on a few of the best picture nominated movies.  Today was Up In the Air and Avatar IMAX 3D. 

Today’s picture is of the ticket stubs from today.

First up, Up In the Air.  I really enjoyed this movie.  Jason Reitman is easily one of my favorite contemporary directors.  He builds visual stories where the images he chooses to show you could almost be watched on mute and still convey the emotional resonance that they achieve with sound.  I felt that his use of subtle symbolism, and even the not-so-subtle symbolism, just lifted me up like a leaf on the wind and carried me through the story.  I felt surrendered to the waves of the film and, because of that surrender, I really connected with the changes that George Cloony’s character was going through.  There is a powerful message on the damage to the economy in this film and at points I think it overwhelms the more subtle message of family and what that means to us individually and how it manifests itself in different lives.  There is a running metaphor in the film about emptying a backpack and  by emptying that backpack we relieve ourselves of responsibility.  By the Cloony character’s definition this is freedom but I saw it as just a “backpack” filled with the unseen burden of solitude.  I don’t believe that there is anyway to avoid emotional baggage.  Trying to hide from it can create it in just the same way that a horrible break-up can. 

The fact that so much can be read into this film, not just the items that I’m bringing up, makes this a true artistic statement to me.  I feel like this one is going to be around for a while.  If you enjoy a really well made film go see it.

Then we make the trip to see Avatar IMAX 3D.  I’m including the “IMAX 3D” part because I think it is important to identify how this particular movie is seen and I was not interested in seeing it any other way.  Does that mean that I fell into some kind of marketing trap?  Perhaps, but I’m willing to let that slide.  On a meta-note the movie theater business and industry is changing and is going to continue to change for a while.  They will be looking for ways to keep movies profitable so that they can remain a viable business and thereby justify the billions and billions of dollars that are spent on them annually.  Make no mistake, the movie business is in just as much trouble as the music industry, but we have better PR people and are trying to learn from RIAA’s mistakes.  The advent of digital everything is great for consumption but horrible for business.  Before this decade I could never fathom how the “Star Trek” future of “no money” could ever exist, but as I see the proliferation of free web services that are better then what you can pay for and the quality of the free content available online my ideas on a “free society” (at least where money is concerned)  have begun to change.  Naturally the big ships of industry are slow to turn and sometimes they over compensate.  Right now 3D entertainment is THE thing.  It’s everywhere and I make the prediction now that 3D home entertainment will still be pushed on the population for the next three years in ridiculous ways.  They will be 3Ding everything and will probably try to convince you to buy a pair of glasses that make your real life 3D.

I hope you’re laughing at that. 

If by chance you aren’t laughing and you just took that advice seriously and you are head of a major corporation who will try and build the “Real Life 3D Glasses” either send me a check or shoot yourself.  It a “six of one, half-a-dozen of the other” situation to me.  Either way don’t expect the current wave of 3D TVs and 3D versions of your favorite old movies to be the last or to go away anytime soon.

That being said, I really think James Cameron got it right.  He built the kind of simple, fun, visually exciting movie that is going to sustain Hollywood for the foreseeable future.  He made a movie, and the technology to create the movie, that cannot be recreated in the home theater space – you need to see this film in the theaters.  It’s what it’s designed for and it’s the only way that I feel the movie will make a strong emotional impact.  I can tell you in my personal experience that, even at it’s almost three hour length, this movie was compressed storytelling in the tradition of a Silver Age comic book.  It gives you all the basic information that you need up front, reminds you with a recap right before specific events happen an never lets you bog down too much forming a separate opinion.  This is not thinking man’s cinema, but that does not make it bad cinema.  What it does make it is easily digestible, understandable and relate-able at a very base level that is clear when you look at the number of tickets sold all around the world.

Avatar is Transformers 2 done right.

Transformers 2 captured something, I still don’t know what it was since I have not seen it, but I’m one of the few.  By all rights it was not a good movie.  No one that I asked could look me in the eyes and say that Transformers 2 was in any way, shape or form a good movie, but it was successful and I think the reason for that is because it plugged into a very basic need that higher brow critics and movie goers aren’t willing to see just yet.  Fourteen year old boys get it.  They really do and even though they can’t explain it to you there’s a reason that so much of today’s entertainment is written for and by that fourteen year old male mentality.  Lord knows that why I’ve been making the movies that I’ve been making and it’s why Transformers 2 was a success in spite of a lack of quality and why Avatar has become the biggest movie of all time with it’s simple, unremarkable story.  Hell, Cameron even started writing it at fourteen!  You don’t need to read too much into it.  We all want to be “the hero,” “the prom king/queen,” “the chosen one.”  Just look back on all of the greatest successes in the world of film and you’ll see all of it is the same.  Whether male or female, little boy or little girl, we want to be that someone special.  James Cameron took that, placed it inside some very exciting advanced special effects and made a film that emotionally effects people – whether you love it or hate it – and I can’t wait to see how this is going to effect Iron Man 2

It worked, I get it and, even though I probably won’t be seeing it again, I really enjoyed the movie.  What did you think, pop it in the comments.

See you tomorrow!

1 Comment

Filed under making movies, movies, project 365 2010, social commentary

Project 365 1-9-2010 The Dreaded Pink Eye

I woke up this morning with crust in my eye.  Crust in your eye is gross. 

For the last few days it’s been very dry here in my neck of the words.  My nose has been stuffed and my eyes have been dry.  Normally I take care of this by drinking outrageous amounts of water, but I haven’t been as diligent as usual.  In an effort to discourage this dry feeling I stopped taking the Claritin I usually take for my allergies.  I’ve been sneezing a bit more, but that’s a small price to pay to keep from being dried out.  Yesterday my eyes were REALLY dry.  I did the best I could to drink a lot of water, but it didn’t work – I just didn’t have access to a lot of water where I was at.  “Besides,” I thought to myself, “I’ll be home soon and Rene has eye drops that could lubricate a steam engine.”  I headed back home, blinking a lot to try and keep my eyes moist.  Once through the door I immediately doused my eyes, first with saline tears then with astringent anti-allergy drops.  Finally my eyes felt normal again!  It felt a bit like there was an eyelash in my right one, but that didn’t surprise me – they’d spent the whole day dry!  Just to be sure I had Rene look and see if she could see anything.  She didn’t see any foreign objects, but immediately quizzed me with a series of questions related to the level of irritation associated with my eye.

See Rene has had pink eye before.  Her nieces have had it.  She’s seen pink eye.  She knows pink eye.  She hates pink eye.  Her questions did not match my symptoms and with the exception of some swelling around my eyes, swelling that is completely in line with my allergies, I showed no signs.

Then I woke up this morning.  As I rolled over from my stomach I asked Rene how my eye looked.  I could feel that there was crust in the corner, but my eye was far from sealed shut. 

She made a face and a noise, “Ewwwwwwwwww.”

That didn’t sound good.

I sat up, used a Kleenex to wipe the crust away taking note of it’s color and texture (light yellow, almost clear and thin and crumbly) and then figured I had pink eye.  Rene was pretty sure I had pink eye.  My eye’s were definitely pink.  The picture above was taken right after I wiped my eye.  It’s pretty much looked the same the rest of the day.

Being an actor/producer is great.  The job is creative, you can set your own hours and it presents opportunities to do really fabulous things while getting paid for it(when you get paid for it) .  The only problem is, it’s a tough gig to maintain.  The acting unions offer insurance coverage, but there is an ever rising minimum base earning that you must make on top of a quarterly payment of between $100 or $200 depending on your plan.  If you can’t maintain either of these you can’t participate in the plan.  Personal insurance for me costs around $140/month for a decent plan.  I don’t really have the spare income to spend on that.  I don’t get sick very often and I don’t do anything that puts me in real or present danger.  Most of the time I’m very healthy and when I do get sick it usually only takes some NyQuil and a couple days before I’m back up to snuff.  On the rare occasion that NyQuil won’t do it I am in a bit of bind.

Enter CVS Minute Clinics.

I found out about these from Rene and on the internet today.  In select CVS Pharmacies are small clinics staffed with RN’s and physician assistants who can diagnose and treat basic ailments, including pink eye!  I visited a branch close to my parent’s house, only had to wait about 30 minutes (there were four people ahead of me) and got out with a diagnosis and my meds for $99.  That’s pretty good.

The Minute Clinics aren’t a fix all, they’re mostly for preventative medicine and small, easily treated things – see the web site for full details – but for the easy stuff, the stuff you can usually diagnose at home, it’s a great solution.  Although I don’t have insurance they accept all major forms of it and, as I found out today, my family doctor is the medical supervisor of the clinic I attended!  Kind of like going to the urgent care in his building, but it didn’t cost me $300.  I went form being really worried this morning to only mildly inconvenienced and coming home with about $40 of other stuff that I picked up in the CVS as I waited for my prescription.  Not much else happened today – I ended up having to wash a bunch of stuff and disinfecting everything else – but it’s a Saturday and sometimes that’s what you do on a Saturday.

Oh, and since I’ve never had pink eye before it counts as something new for “Doing New Things in January.”  Yay for maintaining a theme.

See you tomorrow!  A little less pink.

5 Comments

Filed under doing new things, medical, project 365 2010, social commentary

Your Personal Brand Part 3

MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Plaxo, etc… All social networks designed to let you stay in constant connection with your family, friends, fans, co-workers, bosses, strangers and Tila Tequila.  We’ve come a long way from BBS’s and email addresses and how you represent yourself online is clearly visible to the whole world.

You’ve all heard the stories about the girl who blabbed about how much she hated her boss on Facebook, her boss, who was her Facebook “friend”, saw the update and fired her.  I believe the story originated in England, but there are many times that the news has reported that it has happened.  Or what about my friends who are “friends” with co-workers online and see drunken parties that these “friends” attend only to have those “friends” call in sick the next day.  We willingly surrender a degree of privacy every time we log on and, as those examples clearly illustrate, it is easy to forget who our friends are.

I remember my first social network, Friendster.  I joined because I was invited by my dear friend Jeff Garvin to help stay connected.  I remember the first comments page, which were treated more like compliment boxes, and photos and when I first saw a page that wasn’t a real person – in fact it was a muppet style monster.  The owner of the page updated in the voice of the monster and it was a generally funny page, but it was just the beginning of what MySpace made into an art, poser pages!  Pages made as characters so people could pretend to be the people they always wanted to be.  I was not immune to this.  I had, still have, my personal MySpace page, but I have created my share of character pages – sometimes to promote a movie but other times just for fun.  The anonymity level was determined by how honest you wanted to be and how you wanted to be seen.

Facebook has changed this, to a degree.  It is intrinsically designed to be a page representing the “real” you, but privacy settings and personal editing still control how you are precieved.   Oddly there are lots of folks that seem to forget this.  In an era where your employers, or potential employers, can do a Google search and see all of your drunken exploits or your family can see where you really spend the weekends you were supposed to be visiting grandma it is amazing to me that people aren’t more careful.  To know you is to love you and now people can totally get to know you without ever having to meet you!

When you are in the entertainment industry this can be a great tool.  Here’s a little secret, I will “friend” anyone who asks on MySpace and, to a more limited degree, Facebook.  It’s in my best interest to be able to connect with as many people as possible, especially if they like me enough to help support my projects.  A lot of work goes into maintaining my online identity – and frankly I could be doing more.  My pages?  All maintained so you, the public, know what I’m doing.  This blog?  Designed to communicate and report about things I think are interesting or cool.  I don’t talk about everything, you don’t need to know about funerals I attend or about all of my political leanings, but the ones that are really important to me I mention and endorse/rebut.  I’m certainly not purposely posting embarrassing pictures, although there are a few floating around out there and, though I’m not a fan of censorship, I don’t “drunk tweet” or “drunk update” anymore.  There were a couple months right after the divorce where that happened, but… ugh, more trouble than it was worth.

I can’t stand on a pulpit and claim that I have all of this “online stuff” figured out.  Like I mentioned, there’s more I could do to maintain my online presence.  My personal webpage is a complete disaster and I still haven’t figured out why FriendFeed stopped playing nicely with Twitter and Facebook so that those sites were notified and then broadcast-ed that a new blog post was ready, but I’m not famous enough for people to care… yet.  In the end I still need to protect and portray my online persona in a way that lets people see what is appropriate while still letting me connect in an honest way.

So what am I getting at after three posts?  Self examination.  Take a look at what you have online.  Think about what you’re posting.  You twenty-somethings  who post all the drunken madness, don’t forget that those pictures are online until the servers die – and they don’t do that a lot.  Even if you “clean up” your page who knows what your friends still have up – or worse, your enemies.  And business folks, don’t fear the social networking!  It provides you with an unprecedented way to connect with your customers and, as Pepsi is proving with their bold move to exclusive online advertising, it appears to be the wave of the future.  Use the things you are comfortable with.  Not everybody is meant for Twitter.  MySpace is great for media, not so much for selling mattresses and the whole world is on Facebook.  The opportunities are plentiful, but, as with anything worth doing, there is a certain amount of risk to the unwary.  Responsibility doesn’t end when you log-in and the internet isn’t near as anonymous  as it used to be.  We’re used to portraying our “personal brand” in person, but now that extends to the virtual world.  Be aware of what you’re putting out there and I’ll see you – or at least the “you” you let me see – out there on the interwebs.

See you tomorrow!

Leave a Comment

Filed under art, Facebook, fad, filmmaking, friends, making movies, social commentary, social networking

Your Personal Brand Part 2

Branding as a concept is hardly new.  Any student of business or advertising can tell you that your brand name and brand recognition are extraordinarily important.  The brand name tells the consumer what to expect and, for better or for worse, the level of trust they will place in a product.  There’s a reason why billions and billions of dollars are spent every year making sure that you know that Coke is the Real Thing or that Frosted Flakes are GRRRRRRRREAT!  Johnson & Johnson?  They’re the family company and I’ve heard that Snickers really satifies your hunger.  The name is the product and the product is the name.

Have you heard of the Mars Bar?  It’s a candy bar.  They have a version in the UK, but the kind I’m talking about is the all American Mars Bar, milk chocolate, nougat, almonds and caramel.  Man I love those!  They’ve been my favorite candy bar for a long time.  I don’t even buy them that often because I will eat all that I see until they are gone.  This is a really good candy bar, but sales were down.  In fact the Mars company, the company for which this candy bar is named after, knew that they had to do something.  It’s a good candy bar, it’s a flagship candy bar so how do you raise sales?  They decided to re-brand this candy bar.  See the Mars company also sells a candy bar that you may have heard of, the Snickers Bar.  The Snickers Bar is one of the top selling candy bars of all time.  One act plays have been written about the Snickers Bar.  Say Snickers in a room full of 6-11 year olds and you will be attacked until you produce the candy.  Thus the ever so tasty Mars Bar was re-named – re-branded – Snickers Almond.  The company took the trust and name recognition of the Snickers Bar – the candy that out sells their own flagship bar – and used that to help boost sales.

It worked.

Most people don’t know the history of Snickers Almond.  I know that a few folks thought that it was a new candy bar when they first got one.  I knew it wasn’t and it was a bit disappointing that this great candy bar that everyone was now enjoying could have been enjoyed just as much but not as many people would give it a chance because of its name, its brand.

But what does all of this mean for people?  What does it have to do with email and social networking?  Quite a bit actually.  Whether you like it or not if you are online you are advertising yourself.

Think about it.

It doesn’t matter if you only have an email address and nothing else, anything you have online represents you to those that might find you on the web – and that could be anyone on Earth.

So what do we, the older generation do?  I feel like we are a bit behind the curve with execution, but ahead of the curve when it comes to content and expression.  Any teenager can tweet right to their Facebook and then post a video about it on YouTube all from their phone.  I need to use my Blackberry to do all those things and, with the exception of  Twitter, really can’t get it done right unless I’m sitting in front of a full fledged computer.  I’m just not culturally accustomed to it.  And from my experience I’m about middle of the road for my age group.  I have some friends that are as savvy as a 13 year old, and some whose grandparents are better online.  Although we may not be able to do as much as the kids, what we can do is take advantage of what we do… do.  My friend Mark is an artist.  He does fine art.  He is looking to branch out and wants to do so online.  He has a website and a Facebook but he wants to try Twitter and see if MySpace can do anything for him.  I know a PR firm who only operates in social media and does a great business advertising their clients only online.  PepsiCo has decided to not advertise on the Super Bowl this year because they are moving to a mostly online advertising model.  Interactive social media is becoming more and more important all the time and even the big companies can’t deny it, which brings me back to the title topic, your brand.

Because being online is now almost a requirement how you allow yourself to be seen is more important than ever…

Leave a Comment

Filed under art, Facebook, fad, filmmaking, friends, making movies, social commentary, social networking

Your Personal Brand: Part 1

Hi!  I want to give this next series of blogs a bit of a forward because this is a long blog, or at least it was before I decided to chop it into a few bits.  The idea of a personal brand isn’t new but it has come up a lot lately and so I thought it might be a good idea to really explore the idea.  I’m sure you’ve noticed that I haven’t really kept up with my blog and this entry is part of the reason why.  I’m really hoping and looking forward to the discussions that this subject might spawn.  Enjoy!

I was talking with Rene recently about people, how the mob mentality works and the effect of social media.and then the subject raised again at a friend’s birthday party.  We were talking about social networking and social media and how it has effected our lives and business.  The conversation took an interesting turn when we discussed our ages.  All of us are in our 30’s-40’s, we’re the last generation of people who grew up without the internet in our homes.  For us we’re learning the internet as a tool,  not as a “given”.  We did research for papers when we first found the internet, now you can make friends and can instantly give opinions on just about anything.  Privacy is now marginalized.  People younger than I am don’t necessarily consider privacy the same way as people my age or older do.  It’s a rapidly changing world and the technology isn’t showing any signs of slowing down, but what does that mean for me and people like me?  What does it mean for the younger set and all the children who are being born and growing up in a world that they partially inhabit online?

I’m gonna’ roll back the clock here – to 3rd grade, Mrs. Guazzo’s class and our first trip to the computer lab.  This was 1986 and my family didn’t have a personal computer.  In fact none of my friends at the time had a personal computer, that I remember, except for Tommy Pollard and the only thing we knew how to do on it was play “California Games” which was a collection of beach themed sports, surfing, skate boarding, etc., other than that my trip to the computer lab was the only real encounter I had had with a computer.  I remember hearing my classmates getting excited, “Can we play Oregon Trail?” and murmuring about other things that they had apparently already seen.  There was no Oregon Trail that day, or any day after actually.  Sometimes I feel like I’m the only kid that never actually saw or played the game Oregon Trail and now you can download a pretty advanced version of it to play on your cell phone, but I digress…
We walked into the computer lab, a class room that had tables covered in computers instead of desks, and we were sat in front of our own Apple IIe’s.  Kind of neat, actually, considering that now that classroom must be an actual classroom now and I doubt that class sizes are small enough that each student would get a computer.  Although I remember, even then, times when we had to share two to a computer, but that’s not important right now.  What we did in computer class was practice our computer skills, this included typing (a skill I still haven’t mastered or taken the time to re-learn – although I do type around 60-75 words a minute even with my hunt ‘n peck), turtle shuttle (a game where the “turtle,” the arrow that is on your screen RIGHT NOW, was moved around the screen by typing commands  about how many degrees to rotate and then a numerical value that would equal a certain distance across the screen.  There were maze transparencies that they would tape in front of the screen that we were supposed to navigate.  A line coming out from behind the turtle would show your path and keep you honest.  I really liked that game.  There was also a game where you drove a car and had to run a certain number of errands for your aunt before you ran out of gas.  I liked that game too, but remember thinking how much gas the car we “drove” must have used because you really couldn’t get very far, maybe three blocks, before you needed to refuel.   Not very “green,” but it was the 80’s and we only cared about saving the whales back then – they even made a Star Trek movie about it!

I remember the first Macintosh computers coming to homes.  I remember BBS’s and when my friend Scott came home with a 14.4 bod modem that cost him hundreds of dollars!  I remember when America Online was THE way to get on the internet and how they used to charge you by the hour.  Chat rooms and ICQ.  The beginning of online gaming and when email started to overtake snail mail – and it’s when email became so prevalent that only the smartest of people began to realize what it really meant to have an email address.  That email address was your online persona.  It represented you in the digital world and to those of us that were too young or too shortsighted to see the future it seemed like a fun new fad and not the necessary business tool that it has become.  We had fun monikers, like my first AOL account name chickenshackkid which was the only name I could come up with that wasn’t already taken.  They were alter egos, things that we wanted to be or thought of ourselves in an alternate life.  Mine was the name of a character I had played a few years before I got my address.  I chose it because I wanted the world to know, even if it was in a very obscure way, that I was a working actor – no matter the caliber of the role.  I remember screen names and email addresses like naughtyprincess, cubsfan238, or eric51 all names that identified the owner by how they wanted to be known in the digital world – but many of these names weren’t thought out enough to carry into the “real” world.  And then came the DOTCOM boom and suddenly if you had a business you were trying to figure out how to take it online…

6 Comments

Filed under art, Facebook, fad, filmmaking, friends, making movies, social commentary, social networking

White Chicks & Gang Signs

An old favorite re-posted for my viewing pleasure.

See you tomorrow!

Leave a Comment

Filed under funny, music video, social commentary, video

I Thought I was Done Trying to Get into College!

So I was alarmed when I found this article on CNN.com. As hard as getting into Harvard?!?!? Let 2012 come already!

See you tomorrow!

Washington, D.C. (CNN) — The 650,000 jobs created or saved by the stimulus package so far make up only a small step toward correcting the gap between the tens of millions of unemployed people and the few openings that those people are fighting over.

Even the administration’s goal of creating 3.5 million jobs is far below what the economy really needs. With an official unemployment rate of 10.2 percent, the gap between the number of full-time job openings and the number of people who are unemployed has widened.

Since the beginning of the recession in December 2007, job openings declined from 4.4 million to 2.4 million and the number of officially unemployed persons grew from 7.5 million to 15.7 million, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

If the 15.7 million officially unemployed workers were to apply for those 2.4 million jobs, the chance of any one of them finding a job are about 15 percent, or roughly the same odds as being accepted to the University of Pennsylvania.

The official figure only counts workers as unemployed if they have searched for a job within the past four weeks. But, does it make sense to exclude people who have not looked for work in the past month? Probably not, given that statistics show workers are trying harder than ever to find a job and only give up looking after prolonged periods of unemployment.

The average duration of official unemployment — which, by definition, requires that people be actively searching for a job — has increased to 26.9 weeks, or just over a half a year.

But after many months of unsuccessful job hunting, some people do give up hope. And after four weeks of not looking for a job, they are dropped from official unemployment. It is primarily for this reason that since May, the official labor force has shrunk by 1.1 million people.

The exclusion of these so-called “discouraged” workers from statistics means that the official number of unemployed severely understates the weakness in the labor market. If you include these workers, the unemployment rate would rise to 13 percent, or 21.3 million.

If these workers were to apply for the 2.4 million jobs available, the odds of securing a job would be 11.2 percent, or roughly the same as getting into the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

It gets worse. Another group excluded from the official unemployment report is the growing number of part-time workers who would prefer to have a full-time job. These workers are forced into part-time jobs or are forced to take part-time hours because no full-time work is available.

During the current recession, workers who are “part time for economic reasons” have grown from 4.6 million to 9.3million.

Adding part-time workers to the number of officially unemployed and the discouraged workers, as labor market expert Leo Hindery, Jr., has observed, results in a rise in the real unemployment rate to 19.2 percent, or 30.6 million people.

The odds of any one of these 30 million securing one of the 2.4 million full-time jobs available is 8 percent, the same as the admissions rate of the Ivy League gold standard, Harvard University.

The 3.5 million jobs the stimulus package aims to provide are insufficient. To get the job growth the country needs, the White House should push for sustained infrastructure investment, cutting corporate taxes, and increasing access to credit for small businesses. We still have thirty million workers in the United States who are unemployed, underemployed or discouraged and they face the same odds of finding a job as a high school senior applying to the world’s most elite university.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Samuel Sherraden.

Leave a Comment

Filed under jobs, news, social commentary

D-Bag Solidarity

I’m scared that this movement might come, but it’s worth it for the funny.

It’s funny ‘cuz it’s true.

Leave a Comment

Filed under funny, social commentary, video